Police Violence and the 14th Amendment

The due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” The intent of the amendment was to restrain government actors from arbitrary or capricious acts of violence, imprisonment, or confiscation.

The 14th Amendment was one of several constitutional changes made in the wake of the Civil War. The necessity of guarantees outlined in the due process clause had become all too apparent in the Reconstruction South. The authors of the amendment reported to Congress that across the South orchestrated campaigns of violence and intimidation were being carried out against freed Blacks by White police officers. In the summer of 1866, for example, policemen were instrumental in leading organized attacks on Blacks that left hundreds dead. The conclusion of Congress, and the state legislatures that would ratify the amendment, was that without new constitutional guarantees, state and local governments in the South would not respect the lives or fundamental rights of Black citizens.

The amendment was duly ratified, and Congress enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1873, which encoded the amendment in Chapter 42
§ 1983 of the U.S. Civil Code. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, was reluctant to acknowledge the sea change the 14th Amendment represented. It took the Court over 40 years to even recognize that the due process clause was applicable to state and local governments.

To make matters worse, the Court crafted the concept of qualified immunity to shield individuals from personal liability. The idea of qualified immunity is that a person acting under color of law is not personally liable for violating someone’s civil rights unless that person knew or should have known they were violating clearly established law. Added to this shield against personal liability is the essentially blanket immunity government agencies enjoy via the 11th Amendment. Together, these protections have allowed the courts to regularly refuse to hold police officers and their departments accountable.

In addition, the Supreme Court’s standard on excessive police force is so murky that it renders the bar set by qualified immunity nearly impossible to overcome. In Graham v. Connor in 1989, the Court ruled that cases of excessive police force must be judged by asking what was “reasonable” under the circumstances and defers to the judgment of police officers to determine what force could be necessary in a particular situation. When applying this standard, finding a clear violation for purposes of qualified immunity is extraordinarily difficult.

The refusal of the Court to give full effect to the due process clause has essentially robbed the 14th Amendment of any meaningful force. As a result, the federal protections designed in Reconstruction to rein in police violence have remained dormant. The terrible history of police brutality, especially against people of color, that has plagued America for so long will likely continue unless the accountability demanded by the Constitution is enforced by the Court.

As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. SCOTUS ‘Shadow Docket’ Secretly Pushes Agendas, Issues Major Rulings Without Argument or Public Knowledge, by Dale Chappell
  2. The Junk Science Cops Use to Decide You’re Lying, by Jordan Smith
  3. From the Editors
  4. California Court of Appeal Grants Habeas Relief Over Failure to Instruct Jury on ‘Heat of Passion’, by Dale Chappell
  5. Attacking the Guilty Plea: The Art of Withdrawing a Guilty Plea, by Dale Chappell
  6. Fourth Circuit: Releasee Under First Step Act Can’t ‘Bank’ Extra Time Spent in Prison Toward Future Supervised Release Violation, by Dale Chappell
  7. New Hampshire Supreme Court Announces Defendant Not Required to Identify Evidentiary Support for Noticed Defense, by Douglas Ankney
  8. Sixth Circuit Reverses District Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment to Defendants in § 1983 Suit Against City and Police Officers, by Douglas Ankney
  9. Ninth Circuit Clarifies Use of Rule 60(b) for Changes in Law, by Dale Chappell
  10. Nebraska Supreme Court Announces Remand for New Sentencing Hearing Appropriate Remedy for Enhanced Vehicular Homicide Sentence Without Evidence of Prior Convictions, by Douglas Ankney
  11. Study Exposes Public Defender Plea Negotiation Practices and Suggests New Negotiation Theory, by David Reutter
  12. Colorado Supreme Court Announces New Rules for Awarding Presentencing Credit, by Anthony Accurso
  13. Government Agencies Expand Use of Private Companies to Bypass Constitution, by Casey Bastian
  14. California Supreme Court Announces New Time Limit for Habeas ‘Appeal’ Stages, Clarifying Tolling for Federal Habeas Petitioners, by Dale Chappell
  15. Defense Officials: Law Enforcement in Military Garb not Appropriate, by Casey Bastian
  16. South Carolina Supreme Court: Failure to Give Logan Instruction Not Harmless Error Where Evidence Almost Entirely Circumstantial, by Douglas Ankney
  17. Justice Sotomayor Raises Due Process Concerns Over Eleventh Circuit’s Use of Published Successive Habeas Denial Orders, by Dale Chappell
  18. Colorado Supreme Court: Prosecution Prohibited From Arguing Defendant’s Failure to Retreat Showed Lack of Fear, Undermining Claim of Self-Defense, by Douglas Ankney
  19. Seventh Circuit: District Court Abused Discretion by Denying Relief Without First Considering Recalculations Under First Step Act, by Douglas Ankney
  20. California Supreme Court Vacates LWOP Sentence After Its Recent Cases Clarifying ‘Special Circumstance’ Murder, by Dale Chappell
  21. Arizona Supreme Court Announces Cumulative Error Framework for Reviewing Multiple Instances of Prosecutorial Misconduct, by Douglas Ankney
  22. Indiana Supreme Court: Must Be Immediate Causal Connection Between Confrontation and Other Crime by Defendant to Negate Self-Defense, by Douglas Ankney
  23. Seventh Circuit: Sentences for ‘Non-Covered’ Offenses Can Also Be Reduced Under First Step Act, by Dale Chappell
  24. Ninth Circuit: Police Violate Fourth Amendment Executing Administrative Warrant Where Primary Purpose Is Gathering Evidence for Criminal Investigation, by Douglas Ankney
  25. Interactions Between Diabetics and Law Enforcement Can Become Life-Threatening, by Casey Bastian
  26. Fourth Circuit Grants ‘SOS’ § 2254 Petition Attacking Three-Decade-Old Murder Conviction Based on New Evidence, by Dale Chappell
  27. Washington Federal Court: Looking at Lock Phone Screen Requires Warrant, by Anthony Accurso
  28. North Carolina Supreme Court: Defendant Can’t Be Convicted of Both Habitual Misdemeanor Assault and Felony Assault for Same Act, by Douglas Ankney
  29. Michigan Supreme Court: Probation Compliance Check During Unlawfully Extended Probation Was Unauthorized Warrantless Search, by Matthew Clarke
  30. Medical Experts Publish Guidelines on SUDC, by Douglas Ankney
  31. Successful Alternatives to Armed Police Response, by Edward Lyon
  32. Tenth Circuit: District Court Plainly Erred in Giving Erroneous Constructive Possession of Firearm Instruction, Conviction Reversed, by Douglas Ankney
  33. Second Circuit: District Court’s Failure to Offer Explanation for Its Sentence Constitutes Plain Error, by Douglas Ankney
  34. SCOTUS Goes Live on Camera, by Jayson Hawkins
  35. Maryland Court of Appeals Announces Reasonableness Standard in Providing Advice of Rights to Non-English Speaking Drivers, by David Reutter
  36. Seventh Circuit: Rehaif Creates Defense and Invalidates Defendant’s Guilty Plea, by David Reutter
  37. Chicago’s Police Torture Reparations, by Jayson Hawkins
  38. New Jersey Supreme Court: Juror Excused After Partial Verdict Requires Mistrial on Remaining Counts, by Dale Chappell
  39. Policing and Racial Bias, by Kevin Bliss
  40. How COVID-19 Forces New Releasees Into ‘Survival Mode’, by Dale Chappell
  41. From Detroit: How Not to Use Facial Recognition in Policing, by Anthony Accurso
  42. New Colorado Law Kills Qualified Immunity for Cops, by Dale Chappell
  43. Minnesota Cops Use Contact Tracing to Track Protestor Networks, by Anthony Accurso
  44. When Police Caught Lying, the Spin Begins, by Edward Lyon
  45. Minneapolis: Use of Force Against Blacks 7 Times Higher Than That for Whites, by Kevin Bliss
  46. Risk Assessment Tools Perpetuate Inherent Biases and Prejudices, by Kevin Bliss
  47. New York Police Act With Impunity During Protests, by Kevin Bliss
  48. New ‘Barcode’ System Puts DNA Sample to the Authenticity Test, by Anthony Accurso
  49. Police Violence and the 14th Amendment, by Jayson Hawkins
  50. Police Unions Buy Their Way Out of Reform, by Kevin Bliss
  51. News in Brief
  52. Protecting Your Phone at Protests, by Douglas Ankney

More from Jayson Hawkins:

More from these topics: